The paper provides a theoretical framework for the analysis and evaluation of the disagreement between expert witnesses in evidentiary reasoning. The framework distinguishes four kinds of experts’ disagreement and suggests a set of criteria of evaluation derived from the debate on the epistemology of disagreement.
What to do when experts disagree on judicial fact-finding?
Canale, Damiano
2024
Abstract
The paper provides a theoretical framework for the analysis and evaluation of the disagreement between expert witnesses in evidentiary reasoning. The framework distinguishes four kinds of experts’ disagreement and suggests a set of criteria of evaluation derived from the debate on the epistemology of disagreement.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
DC_What to do when expert disagree_PRINT.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: chapter
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
2.38 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.38 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
