National and international lawmakers are increasingly focusing on sustainability reporting as a way to foster socially responsible corporate behavior. Within the European Union, Directive 2014/95/EU has introduced reporting obligations for large enterprises, listed companies, and firms operating in the financial sector on a variety of non-financial issues. Non-Financial disclosure is, however, just one of the legal strategies that the European lawmaker has put in place to foster corporate social responsibility. The European regulatory framework aims, in fact, at using shareholders and their monitoring power as a way to stir corporate behavior towards sustainability. Since corporate boards are accountable to shareholders only, if investors and financial intermediaries start paying attention to social and environmental issues in their investment decisions, corporate conduct should adjust accordingly. The key tool that makes this mechanism work is non-financial disclosure, which provides market operators with the data to make informed, socially responsible decisions. The content of the disclosure is significantly shaped by the notion of materiality, which has been traditionally employed to determine which financial information companies should disclose. This paper argues, however, that the concept of materiality in non-financial disclosure cannot and should not be a mere duplication of materiality in accounting, auditing and financial markets regulation. The relevant benchmark to assess materiality remains the “reasonable investor”, but for the purposes of non-financial disclosure the reasonable investor is socially and environmentally conscious and pays attention to the long-term risks and opportunities of sustainability policies and issues. As a result, we advocate for a forward-looking and investor-based criterion in order to determine whether the disclosure enables an understanding of the impact of the company’s activity, which leads to more narrative and consequence-oriented disclosure on the non-financial issues on which the company has had, or is likely to have, the greatest impact.
Making non-financial information count: accountability and materiality in sustainability reporting
Chiara Mosca
;Chiara Picciau
2020
Abstract
National and international lawmakers are increasingly focusing on sustainability reporting as a way to foster socially responsible corporate behavior. Within the European Union, Directive 2014/95/EU has introduced reporting obligations for large enterprises, listed companies, and firms operating in the financial sector on a variety of non-financial issues. Non-Financial disclosure is, however, just one of the legal strategies that the European lawmaker has put in place to foster corporate social responsibility. The European regulatory framework aims, in fact, at using shareholders and their monitoring power as a way to stir corporate behavior towards sustainability. Since corporate boards are accountable to shareholders only, if investors and financial intermediaries start paying attention to social and environmental issues in their investment decisions, corporate conduct should adjust accordingly. The key tool that makes this mechanism work is non-financial disclosure, which provides market operators with the data to make informed, socially responsible decisions. The content of the disclosure is significantly shaped by the notion of materiality, which has been traditionally employed to determine which financial information companies should disclose. This paper argues, however, that the concept of materiality in non-financial disclosure cannot and should not be a mere duplication of materiality in accounting, auditing and financial markets regulation. The relevant benchmark to assess materiality remains the “reasonable investor”, but for the purposes of non-financial disclosure the reasonable investor is socially and environmentally conscious and pays attention to the long-term risks and opportunities of sustainability policies and issues. As a result, we advocate for a forward-looking and investor-based criterion in order to determine whether the disclosure enables an understanding of the impact of the company’s activity, which leads to more narrative and consequence-oriented disclosure on the non-financial issues on which the company has had, or is likely to have, the greatest impact.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
C.Picciau.C.Mosca.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione:
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.15 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.15 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.