Meng raises an interesting issue concerning the relationship among pivotal predictive distribution, posterior predictive distribution and h-distribution. He emphasizes how it is important using the "appropriate" scale both for observations and parameters and presents an example in which the three distributions coincide. We show why this result is not completely surprising and how part of the explanation can be found by extending a result due to Lindley who explains the relationship between a fiducial distribution and a posterior distribution.

Discussion of "What’s the H in H-likelihood: A Holy Grail or an Achilles’ Heel?" by Meng, X.-L.

VERONESE, PIERO
2011

Abstract

Meng raises an interesting issue concerning the relationship among pivotal predictive distribution, posterior predictive distribution and h-distribution. He emphasizes how it is important using the "appropriate" scale both for observations and parameters and presents an example in which the three distributions coincide. We show why this result is not completely surprising and how part of the explanation can be found by extending a result due to Lindley who explains the relationship between a fiducial distribution and a posterior distribution.
2011
9780199694587
Bayesian Statistics 9
Veronese, Piero
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3737846
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact