We study the policy of selecting incoming migrants when the receiving country’s own welfare guides the choice of policy, when the receiving country’s decisions are made under informational asymmetry, and when migrants differ in their skill levels. Selection can be achieved via the levying of a proportional tax on migrants’ earnings. We calculate the optimal tax when human capital is fixed (“a fixed human capital framework”), and in the presence of an incentive to form human capital (“an adjustable human capital framework”). In contrast to the fixed human capital framework, in the adjustable human capital framework the tax policy of the receiving country cannot be divorced from the behavior of the skilled workers at origin: there is a trade-off between selecting high skill migrant workers and generating tax revenue on the one hand, and the possibly detrimental reaction with respect to the incentive to invest in skill acquisition on the other hand. The level of the tax that the receiving country will choose is sensitive to the calculus of the workers who form human capital in the sending country. The absence or presence of a skill formation response matters for establishing the impact of a selection policy on the welfare of the natives of the sending country. We find that there are instances in which the sending country experiences an aggregate increase in welfare upon selection, even though the tax is selected in order to maximize the welfare of the natives of the receiving country.

On an Optimal Selective Migration Policy when Information is Asymmetric and Incentives Count

CASARICO, ALESSANDRA;
2009

Abstract

We study the policy of selecting incoming migrants when the receiving country’s own welfare guides the choice of policy, when the receiving country’s decisions are made under informational asymmetry, and when migrants differ in their skill levels. Selection can be achieved via the levying of a proportional tax on migrants’ earnings. We calculate the optimal tax when human capital is fixed (“a fixed human capital framework”), and in the presence of an incentive to form human capital (“an adjustable human capital framework”). In contrast to the fixed human capital framework, in the adjustable human capital framework the tax policy of the receiving country cannot be divorced from the behavior of the skilled workers at origin: there is a trade-off between selecting high skill migrant workers and generating tax revenue on the one hand, and the possibly detrimental reaction with respect to the incentive to invest in skill acquisition on the other hand. The level of the tax that the receiving country will choose is sensitive to the calculus of the workers who form human capital in the sending country. The absence or presence of a skill formation response matters for establishing the impact of a selection policy on the welfare of the natives of the sending country. We find that there are instances in which the sending country experiences an aggregate increase in welfare upon selection, even though the tax is selected in order to maximize the welfare of the natives of the receiving country.
2009
9780230546998
J. Kornai, L. Mátyás, G. Roland
Corruption, Development and Institutional Design
Oded, Stark; Casarico, Alessandra; Silke, Uebelmesser
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/577391
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact