Recent streams in both the knowledge management literature and the MNC literature suggest the use of knowledge-teams for purposes of lateral knowledge integration and combination to stimulate innovation and organizational learning. While the use of knowledge-teams is widespread in MNCs, there is also raising concern in practice regarding costs and concrete strategic benefits of such teams. Using the case of a large MNC to analyse various types of knowledge-teams as a context for grounded theory development, this paper identifies contingency factors (strategic importance of knowledge and focus on knowledge creation vs. knowledge sharing) that influence the governance of knowledge teams.

Governance of Knowledge-teams in MNC: The Case of HeidelbergCement

VENZIN, MARKUS
2003

Abstract

Recent streams in both the knowledge management literature and the MNC literature suggest the use of knowledge-teams for purposes of lateral knowledge integration and combination to stimulate innovation and organizational learning. While the use of knowledge-teams is widespread in MNCs, there is also raising concern in practice regarding costs and concrete strategic benefits of such teams. Using the case of a large MNC to analyse various types of knowledge-teams as a context for grounded theory development, this paper identifies contingency factors (strategic importance of knowledge and focus on knowledge creation vs. knowledge sharing) that influence the governance of knowledge teams.
2003
V., Mahnke; Venzin, Markus
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/52160
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact