Perceptions versus reality: public overestimation of recidivism rates

The current study tests the accuracy of the public's knowledge of recidivism risk over time, using arrest records as a benchmark. It asks a large public sample about the likelihood of first-time arrestees being arrested again compared to the probability of the general population being arrested for a first offense. The results show that respondents highly overestimate first-time arrestees’ likelihood to recidivate, and this overestimation becomes more pronounced over time. These results have significant policy ramifications across various domains where individuals exercise critical decision-making authority affecting justice-involved people. These include access to criminal record information, judicial sentencing, parole determinations, employment opportunities, and housing allocation. Disseminating accurate information regarding the declining risk of recidivism to the general population and key stakeholders is paramount in formulating and implementing criminal justice reforms.