CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System
IRIS è la soluzione IT che facilita la raccolta e la gestione dei dati relativi alle attività e ai prodotti della ricerca. Fornisce a ricercatori, amministratori e valutatori gli strumenti per monitorare i risultati della ricerca, aumentarne la visibilità e allocare in modo efficace le risorse disponibili.
EnglishTransnational, international, multinational, supranational. The lexicon of European integration wrestles with the same Westphalian “nation-state paradigm” that has fragmented so much modern European historiography. For three generations, European integration scholars have debated the complex relationship of the state to the union and offered divergent narratives of the process by which member states pursued cooperation as well as its implications. Early scholarship echoed the ambitions of the federalist architects with a teleology of nations beyond nationalism; later works argued that cooperation actually strengthened and reified the nation-state. Amid the academy’s global turn, a new cohort has moved beyond the state to consider the European Union (EU) and its predecessors in the context of the globalization of both markets and market-oriented policies designed to buttress boundaryless trade. The events of the twenty-first century—from protracted crises to Britain’s exit from the EU—have only intensified debates about the intransience of the nation and the future of interdependence in the region, demanding: How can we understand the history and historiography of contemporary Europe between nationalism and neoliberalism?
| Titolo: | Europe between Nationalism and Neoliberalism | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2022 | |
| Autori: | ||
| Autori: | Ballor, Grace | |
| Rivista: | THE AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW | |
| Abstract: | Transnational, international, multinational, supranational. The lexicon of European integration wrestles with the same Westphalian “nation-state paradigm” that has fragmented so much modern European historiography. For three generations, European integration scholars have debated the complex relationship of the state to the union and offered divergent narratives of the process by which member states pursued cooperation as well as its implications. Early scholarship echoed the ambitions of the federalist architects with a teleology of nations beyond nationalism; later works argued that cooperation actually strengthened and reified the nation-state. Amid the academy’s global turn, a new cohort has moved beyond the state to consider the European Union (EU) and its predecessors in the context of the globalization of both markets and market-oriented policies designed to buttress boundaryless trade. The events of the twenty-first century—from protracted crises to Britain’s exit from the EU—have only intensified debates about the intransience of the nation and the future of interdependence in the region, demanding: How can we understand the history and historiography of contemporary Europe between nationalism and neoliberalism? | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhac133 | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 08 - Research notes or short article / Note di ricerca o brevi articoli su rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHR Acceptance.pdf | letter | Allegato per valutazione Bocconi (Attachment for Bocconi evaluation) | NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto | Administrator Richiedi una copia |
| AHR-2021-REF-0469.R1-CLEAN.docx | article | Documento in Pre-print (Pre-print document) | NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto | Administrator Richiedi una copia |
Copyright © 2022