Starting from a decision by the Criminal Court of Cassation of July 2020, the essay examines some evolutionary lines in the use of interpretive methodologies by Italian courts as a consequence of the emergency triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic. The essay focuses, in particular, on the characterization of the pandemic as an "extra ordinem fact" which justifies ad hoc interpretive methodologies in criminal law, and on the qualification of balancing as a form of “adaptive interpretation”. The point made in the essay is that identifying balancing as a form of adaptive interpretation generates the “hyper-constitutionalisation” of the legal system, a phenomenon whose effects are critically considered.
Fatti extra ordinem. L'interpretazione giudiziale al tempo del COVID-19
Canale, Damiano
2021
Abstract
Starting from a decision by the Criminal Court of Cassation of July 2020, the essay examines some evolutionary lines in the use of interpretive methodologies by Italian courts as a consequence of the emergency triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic. The essay focuses, in particular, on the characterization of the pandemic as an "extra ordinem fact" which justifies ad hoc interpretive methodologies in criminal law, and on the qualification of balancing as a form of “adaptive interpretation”. The point made in the essay is that identifying balancing as a form of adaptive interpretation generates the “hyper-constitutionalisation” of the legal system, a phenomenon whose effects are critically considered.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
DPC_Riv_Trim_1_2021_Canale.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
470.55 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
470.55 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.