Much of Chinese civil law is a product of Western legal transplants. However, when dealing with a country as old and sophisticated as China, one can easily miss the whole picture by focusing only on the written statutes. Appearances do not tell much. Chinese Civil Code was enacted on May 28th, 2020. This is the first Civil Code in the history of Communist China. This essay takes a comparative and historical look at the codified Chinese tort law, shows its promises and perils of its legal transplants and, most importantly, identifies some persistent problems. Some of these problems come from contradictions among doctrines borrowed from different legal systems, others from clash between legal transplants and the pre-existing social norms that are based on different philosophical ideas, others might be due to the tension between doctrinal innovations and the existing structures. Specifically, this essay examines the doctrinal innovation of having an independent personality rights law operating outside of tort law, the doctrinal uncertainty in determining the scope of protected rights and a rule of liability without fault that resonates with Chinese traditional moral philosophy.

Chinese tort law: tradition, transplants and some difficulties

Hao Jiang
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2021

Abstract

Much of Chinese civil law is a product of Western legal transplants. However, when dealing with a country as old and sophisticated as China, one can easily miss the whole picture by focusing only on the written statutes. Appearances do not tell much. Chinese Civil Code was enacted on May 28th, 2020. This is the first Civil Code in the history of Communist China. This essay takes a comparative and historical look at the codified Chinese tort law, shows its promises and perils of its legal transplants and, most importantly, identifies some persistent problems. Some of these problems come from contradictions among doctrines borrowed from different legal systems, others from clash between legal transplants and the pre-existing social norms that are based on different philosophical ideas, others might be due to the tension between doctrinal innovations and the existing structures. Specifically, this essay examines the doctrinal innovation of having an independent personality rights law operating outside of tort law, the doctrinal uncertainty in determining the scope of protected rights and a rule of liability without fault that resonates with Chinese traditional moral philosophy.
9781789905977
Bussani, Mauro; Sebok, Anthony J.
Comparative tort law : global perspectives
2.ed.
Jiang, Hao
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Chinese tort law 2020.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: capitolo
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (Post-print document)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 364.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
364.14 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11565/4033976
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact