The relationship between consumers’ privacy concerns and their willingness to disclose personal information to retailers is more complex than a simple negative one. The multi-faced context, within which privacy decisions take place, shapes and bounds this relationship. Drawing on privacy contextual integrity theory, we model the privacy decisions as influenced by individuals’ multilevel trusting surroundings, which include trust in a retailer and in its personnel at the micro-level, and trust in a country at the macro-level. Based on 22,050 survey data across seven product categories in fourteen countries, our Bayesian multilevel modeling reveals that micro- and macro-level trust may promote consumers’ disclosure intentions via three mechanisms: (1) micro-level trust positive effect on consumers’ willingness to disclose their data; (2) micro-level trust effect by attenuating privacy concerns’ negative influence on this willingness; and (3) the positive indirect effect of trust in the country on both the direct and indirect impacts of trust in a retailer and in its personnel. Interestingly, trust’s direct effects are found in all the investigated types of information (i.e., identification, medical, financial, locational, demographic, lifestyle, and media usage data), whereas the indirect effects are found to vary across information types. Our post-hoc cluster analysis shows that different retail contexts can be classified into three clusters and help retailers understand whether they should invest in developing both trust in their retail company and in their personnel, or mainly on one of the two. By taking different types of trust and context effects into consideration, our findings help different retailers encourage customers to disclose their data with them.

What information do shoppers share? The effect of personnel-, retailer-, and country-trust on willingness to share information

Grosso, Monica
;
Castaldo, Sandro;
2020

Abstract

The relationship between consumers’ privacy concerns and their willingness to disclose personal information to retailers is more complex than a simple negative one. The multi-faced context, within which privacy decisions take place, shapes and bounds this relationship. Drawing on privacy contextual integrity theory, we model the privacy decisions as influenced by individuals’ multilevel trusting surroundings, which include trust in a retailer and in its personnel at the micro-level, and trust in a country at the macro-level. Based on 22,050 survey data across seven product categories in fourteen countries, our Bayesian multilevel modeling reveals that micro- and macro-level trust may promote consumers’ disclosure intentions via three mechanisms: (1) micro-level trust positive effect on consumers’ willingness to disclose their data; (2) micro-level trust effect by attenuating privacy concerns’ negative influence on this willingness; and (3) the positive indirect effect of trust in the country on both the direct and indirect impacts of trust in a retailer and in its personnel. Interestingly, trust’s direct effects are found in all the investigated types of information (i.e., identification, medical, financial, locational, demographic, lifestyle, and media usage data), whereas the indirect effects are found to vary across information types. Our post-hoc cluster analysis shows that different retail contexts can be classified into three clusters and help retailers understand whether they should invest in developing both trust in their retail company and in their personnel, or mainly on one of the two. By taking different types of trust and context effects into consideration, our findings help different retailers encourage customers to disclose their data with them.
2020
2020
Grosso, Monica; Castaldo, Sandro; Li, Hua (Ariel); Larivière, Bart
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/4033503
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact