This essay reply to the criticisms of my book "Conflitti pratici". Quando il diritto diventa immmorale raised by Alberto Andronico, Francisco Javier Ansuátegui Roig, Pierfrancesco Biasetti, Tommaso Greco, Eugenio Lecaldano, Ulderico Pomarici and Francesco Viola. The paper focuses on the task of legal philosophy in teaching and in the public debate, the distinction between legal positivism and legal non-positivism, the relationship between metaethics and legal philosophy, the nature of practical conflicts, and the connection between rules and values.
Il rapporto tra diritto e morale nella prospettiva della filosofia del diritto: appunti in margine a "Conflitti pratici"
Canale, Damiano
2018
Abstract
This essay reply to the criticisms of my book "Conflitti pratici". Quando il diritto diventa immmorale raised by Alberto Andronico, Francisco Javier Ansuátegui Roig, Pierfrancesco Biasetti, Tommaso Greco, Eugenio Lecaldano, Ulderico Pomarici and Francesco Viola. The paper focuses on the task of legal philosophy in teaching and in the public debate, the distinction between legal positivism and legal non-positivism, the relationship between metaethics and legal philosophy, the nature of practical conflicts, and the connection between rules and values.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CANALE_E&P_2018.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo completo
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
208.88 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
208.88 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.