This essay reply to the criticisms of my book "Conflitti pratici". Quando il diritto diventa immmorale raised by Alberto Andronico, Francisco Javier Ansuátegui Roig, Pierfrancesco Biasetti, Tommaso Greco, Eugenio Lecaldano, Ulderico Pomarici and Francesco Viola. The paper focuses on the task of legal philosophy in teaching and in the public debate, the distinction between legal positivism and legal non-positivism, the relationship between metaethics and legal philosophy, the nature of practical conflicts, and the connection between rules and values.

Il rapporto tra diritto e morale nella prospettiva della filosofia del diritto: appunti in margine a "Conflitti pratici"

Canale, Damiano
2018

Abstract

This essay reply to the criticisms of my book "Conflitti pratici". Quando il diritto diventa immmorale raised by Alberto Andronico, Francisco Javier Ansuátegui Roig, Pierfrancesco Biasetti, Tommaso Greco, Eugenio Lecaldano, Ulderico Pomarici and Francesco Viola. The paper focuses on the task of legal philosophy in teaching and in the public debate, the distinction between legal positivism and legal non-positivism, the relationship between metaethics and legal philosophy, the nature of practical conflicts, and the connection between rules and values.
2018
2018
Canale, Damiano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CANALE_E&P_2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo completo
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 208.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
208.88 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/4014725
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact