Research on later-life transitions spans multiple disciplines, yet perspectives often remain fragmented. This paper demonstrates how interdisciplinarity, guided by epistemic reflexivity, can produce a more integrated understanding of later-life transitions. Drawing on a metanarrative review, four research traditions—education, sociology, gerontology, and management—are examined to reconstruct discipline-specific storylines and generate a cross disciplinary synthesis. The process unfolds through iterative reflection on assumptions, concepts, and methods, highlighting how disciplinary positions shape knowledge. Six cross disciplinary narratives emerge: vulnerability and loss, learning and growth, relational embeddedness, unequal trajectories, enacted practices, and systemic dynamics. Together, they portray later-life transitions as complex, relational, and systemic processes spanning micro, meso, and macro levels. Methodologically, the study illustrates how combining meta-narrative review with epistemic reflexivity enables the construction of integrated interdisciplinary knowledge. Conceptually, it reframes later-life transitions as multilevel, dynamic phenomena. More broadly, the study positions research on later-life transitions as a productive arena for developing interdisciplinary approaches in educational gerontology
Interdisciplinarity and Epistemic Reflexivity. A Methodological Approach to the Study of Later-Life Transitions
Amelia Compagni;Maria Vittoria Bufali;
In corso di stampa
Abstract
Research on later-life transitions spans multiple disciplines, yet perspectives often remain fragmented. This paper demonstrates how interdisciplinarity, guided by epistemic reflexivity, can produce a more integrated understanding of later-life transitions. Drawing on a metanarrative review, four research traditions—education, sociology, gerontology, and management—are examined to reconstruct discipline-specific storylines and generate a cross disciplinary synthesis. The process unfolds through iterative reflection on assumptions, concepts, and methods, highlighting how disciplinary positions shape knowledge. Six cross disciplinary narratives emerge: vulnerability and loss, learning and growth, relational embeddedness, unequal trajectories, enacted practices, and systemic dynamics. Together, they portray later-life transitions as complex, relational, and systemic processes spanning micro, meso, and macro levels. Methodologically, the study illustrates how combining meta-narrative review with epistemic reflexivity enables the construction of integrated interdisciplinary knowledge. Conceptually, it reframes later-life transitions as multilevel, dynamic phenomena. More broadly, the study positions research on later-life transitions as a productive arena for developing interdisciplinary approaches in educational gerontologyI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


