We first discuss why and how banking supervisors should be held accountable for their activities, then consider the case of the ECB/SSM to report on the academic debate on its faults and merits. We also review the main accountability channels between the ECB and the EP, showing how they have been used since 2014. Finally, we outline some possible steps to improve the ECB’s accountability in the short term. This document was provided by the Economic Governance and EMU Scrutiny Unit at the request of the ECON Committee.

10 years of parliamentary scrutiny over the Single Supervisory Mechanism - Are current transparency and accountability mechanisms adequate for the next legislative term?

Andrea Resti
2024

Abstract

We first discuss why and how banking supervisors should be held accountable for their activities, then consider the case of the ECB/SSM to report on the academic debate on its faults and merits. We also review the main accountability channels between the ECB and the EP, showing how they have been used since 2014. Finally, we outline some possible steps to improve the ECB’s accountability in the short term. This document was provided by the Economic Governance and EMU Scrutiny Unit at the request of the ECON Committee.
2024
Resti, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/4081903
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact