Does AI democratize knowledge production or amplify existing disparities? We investigate this tension by studying the deployment of neural machine translation across more than 100 Wikipedia language communities. Leveraging rich, fine-grained data and exogenous variation from a natural experiment, we uncover the ``AI Democratization Paradox,'' where the technology simultaneously drives democratizing and concentrating forces. AI lowered barriers, leading to a substantial increase in content creation across diverse target languages without sacrificing quality or readership. However, the benefits were concentrated: well-resourced communities captured disproportionate gains—3-4 times larger than mid-tier editions. While editors actively leveraged AI to address representation gaps, translating female biographies at twice the expected rate, structural constraints limited the impact in high-need areas. We conclude that technological solutions alone cannot overcome structural inequalities; AI's distributional impact is contingent on the interplay between technological capabilities and existing social structures.
The AI Democratization Paradox: Evidence from Decentralized Knowledge Communities
Kai Zhu;
In corso di stampa
Abstract
Does AI democratize knowledge production or amplify existing disparities? We investigate this tension by studying the deployment of neural machine translation across more than 100 Wikipedia language communities. Leveraging rich, fine-grained data and exogenous variation from a natural experiment, we uncover the ``AI Democratization Paradox,'' where the technology simultaneously drives democratizing and concentrating forces. AI lowered barriers, leading to a substantial increase in content creation across diverse target languages without sacrificing quality or readership. However, the benefits were concentrated: well-resourced communities captured disproportionate gains—3-4 times larger than mid-tier editions. While editors actively leveraged AI to address representation gaps, translating female biographies at twice the expected rate, structural constraints limited the impact in high-need areas. We conclude that technological solutions alone cannot overcome structural inequalities; AI's distributional impact is contingent on the interplay between technological capabilities and existing social structures.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
