This article explores the unprecedented use of executive orders by President Trump during the early months of his second term, focusing on the constitutional and political implications of this practice. It examines the legal nature of executive orders within the framework of the U.S. separation of powers, highlighting their ambiguous normative status and the historical tensions they generate between the executive and legislative branches. By analyzing both the content and strategic function of the most relevant executive orders—particularly those affecting civil rights, immigration, education, and abortion—the article investigates how Trump seeks to consolidate presidential power and challenge congressional authority. Special attention is given to the weakening of judicial remedies, especially following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. CASA, which limited the scope of nationwide injunctions. The article ultimately reflects on the risks posed to democratic balance by an expansive interpretation of the unitary executive theory and the potential drift toward a “counter-constitution”.
Executive orders e ruolo presidenziale: la sfida di Trump alla separazione dei poteri
Bassini, Marco
2025
Abstract
This article explores the unprecedented use of executive orders by President Trump during the early months of his second term, focusing on the constitutional and political implications of this practice. It examines the legal nature of executive orders within the framework of the U.S. separation of powers, highlighting their ambiguous normative status and the historical tensions they generate between the executive and legislative branches. By analyzing both the content and strategic function of the most relevant executive orders—particularly those affecting civil rights, immigration, education, and abortion—the article investigates how Trump seeks to consolidate presidential power and challenge congressional authority. Special attention is given to the weakening of judicial remedies, especially following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. CASA, which limited the scope of nationwide injunctions. The article ultimately reflects on the risks posed to democratic balance by an expansive interpretation of the unitary executive theory and the potential drift toward a “counter-constitution”.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
OSF 2 2025 Bassini (1).pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
188.65 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
188.65 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


