The spread of disinformation, such as false and fabricated content as amplified by the expansion of artificial intelligence systems, has captured the attention of policymakers on a global scale. However, addressing disinformation leads constitutional democracies to address questions, particularly regarding freedom of expression as the living core of a democratic society. If, on the one hand, this constitutional right has been considered a barrier to public authorities’ interferences, on the other hand, the spread of fabricated content and manipulative techniques, including deepfakes, challenge liberal views and move the constitutional perspective towards a reactive dimension. This constitutional question is further enriched by the role of online platforms which are essential tiles of a mosaic picturing the potential regulatory strategies and the limit of public enforcement to tackle disinformation. Between liberal and illiberal approaches to address online disinformation, the Union is advancing an alternative policy solution based on a regulatory mix, as underlined by the Digital Services Act, the Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation, and the Artificial Intelligence Act. Within this framework, this work argues that the European approach to disinformation is leading to a unique regulatory system focused on the dynamics characterizing the spread of online disinformation.
The European Constitutional way to address disinformation in the age of Artificial Intelligence
De Gregorio, Giovanni;Pollicino, Oreste
In corso di stampa
Abstract
The spread of disinformation, such as false and fabricated content as amplified by the expansion of artificial intelligence systems, has captured the attention of policymakers on a global scale. However, addressing disinformation leads constitutional democracies to address questions, particularly regarding freedom of expression as the living core of a democratic society. If, on the one hand, this constitutional right has been considered a barrier to public authorities’ interferences, on the other hand, the spread of fabricated content and manipulative techniques, including deepfakes, challenge liberal views and move the constitutional perspective towards a reactive dimension. This constitutional question is further enriched by the role of online platforms which are essential tiles of a mosaic picturing the potential regulatory strategies and the limit of public enforcement to tackle disinformation. Between liberal and illiberal approaches to address online disinformation, the Union is advancing an alternative policy solution based on a regulatory mix, as underlined by the Digital Services Act, the Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation, and the Artificial Intelligence Act. Within this framework, this work argues that the European approach to disinformation is leading to a unique regulatory system focused on the dynamics characterizing the spread of online disinformation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
German_Law_Journal_Paper disinformation.docx
non disponibili
Descrizione: article
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print (Pre-print document)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
160.54 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
160.54 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
accettazione_GLJ.jpg
non disponibili
Descrizione: accettazione German Law Journal
Tipologia:
Allegato per valutazione Bocconi (Attachment for Bocconi evaluation)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
463.46 kB
Formato
JPEG
|
463.46 kB | JPEG | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.