The spread of disinformation, such as false and fabricated content as amplified by the expansion of artificial intelligence systems, has captured the attention of policymakers on a global scale. However, addressing disinformation leads constitutional democracies to address questions, particularly regarding freedom of expression as the living core of a democratic society. If, on the one hand, this constitutional right has been considered a barrier to public authorities’ interferences, on the other hand, the spread of fabricated content and manipulative techniques, including deepfakes, challenge liberal views and move the constitutional perspective towards a reactive dimension. This constitutional question is further enriched by the role of online platforms which are essential tiles of a mosaic picturing the potential regulatory strategies and the limit of public enforcement to tackle disinformation. Between liberal and illiberal approaches to address online disinformation, the Union is advancing an alternative policy solution based on a regulatory mix, as underlined by the Digital Services Act, the Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation, and the Artificial Intelligence Act. Within this framework, this work argues that the European approach to disinformation is leading to a unique regulatory system focused on the dynamics characterizing the spread of online disinformation.

The European Constitutional way to address disinformation in the age of Artificial Intelligence

De Gregorio, Giovanni;Pollicino, Oreste
In corso di stampa

Abstract

The spread of disinformation, such as false and fabricated content as amplified by the expansion of artificial intelligence systems, has captured the attention of policymakers on a global scale. However, addressing disinformation leads constitutional democracies to address questions, particularly regarding freedom of expression as the living core of a democratic society. If, on the one hand, this constitutional right has been considered a barrier to public authorities’ interferences, on the other hand, the spread of fabricated content and manipulative techniques, including deepfakes, challenge liberal views and move the constitutional perspective towards a reactive dimension. This constitutional question is further enriched by the role of online platforms which are essential tiles of a mosaic picturing the potential regulatory strategies and the limit of public enforcement to tackle disinformation. Between liberal and illiberal approaches to address online disinformation, the Union is advancing an alternative policy solution based on a regulatory mix, as underlined by the Digital Services Act, the Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation, and the Artificial Intelligence Act. Within this framework, this work argues that the European approach to disinformation is leading to a unique regulatory system focused on the dynamics characterizing the spread of online disinformation.
In corso di stampa
De Gregorio, Giovanni; Pollicino, Oreste
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
German_Law_Journal_Paper disinformation.docx

non disponibili

Descrizione: article
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (Pre-print document)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 160.54 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
160.54 kB Microsoft Word XML   Visualizza/Apri
accettazione_GLJ.jpg

non disponibili

Descrizione: accettazione German Law Journal
Tipologia: Allegato per valutazione Bocconi (Attachment for Bocconi evaluation)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 463.46 kB
Formato JPEG
463.46 kB JPEG   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/4070257
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact