This research reconstructs the business dynamics behind the evolution of the European mutual fund industry, which led Luxembourg to become its main international gateway since the 1960s. We analyze the local mutual fund industry to understand how political and financial élites influence the economic specialization of small states. We argue that a closely-knit community of local professionals and politicians, well-versed in corporate and European legislation, leveraged the Grand-Duchy’s small state status within the nascent European Community to become a financial hub specializing in mutual funds within an emerging network of international financial centers. This position was achieved through bifurcation of sovereignty strategy based on two main premises. First, on the systematic acceptance of conflicts of interest within local financial and political leadership, comprising overlapping roles, revolving-doors, and familial ties in business relationships. Second, on regulatory engineering practices such as dynamic interpretation of laws and strategic planning of directives assimilation to advance Luxembourg’s interests as opposed to its EU counterparts. The analysis uses archival material from nine archival collections and oral history interviews.
Business-government networks in small states: the emergence and evolution of Luxemburg global mutual fund industry (1945-1988)
Giacomin, Valeria;Calabrese, Matteo
In corso di stampa
Abstract
This research reconstructs the business dynamics behind the evolution of the European mutual fund industry, which led Luxembourg to become its main international gateway since the 1960s. We analyze the local mutual fund industry to understand how political and financial élites influence the economic specialization of small states. We argue that a closely-knit community of local professionals and politicians, well-versed in corporate and European legislation, leveraged the Grand-Duchy’s small state status within the nascent European Community to become a financial hub specializing in mutual funds within an emerging network of international financial centers. This position was achieved through bifurcation of sovereignty strategy based on two main premises. First, on the systematic acceptance of conflicts of interest within local financial and political leadership, comprising overlapping roles, revolving-doors, and familial ties in business relationships. Second, on regulatory engineering practices such as dynamic interpretation of laws and strategic planning of directives assimilation to advance Luxembourg’s interests as opposed to its EU counterparts. The analysis uses archival material from nine archival collections and oral history interviews.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
_Mutual Funds Revision 2.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: article
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print (Pre-print document)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
421.84 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
421.84 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Accepted.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: email di accettazione
Tipologia:
Allegato per valutazione Bocconi (Attachment for Bocconi evaluation)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
469.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
469.61 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.