The comparative analysis of Rule 19(b) and legal rules governing the required joinder of parties in Italian and German legal systems suggests some thoughts about a better way to define the judicial discretion in determining whether a person who should be joined is actually indispensable – that is, essential to dismiss the action when that person cannot be joined.
Is federal rule of civil procedure 19 (B) too discretionary?
Cavallini, Cesare;Gaboardi, Marcello
2021
Abstract
The comparative analysis of Rule 19(b) and legal rules governing the required joinder of parties in Italian and German legal systems suggests some thoughts about a better way to define the judicial discretion in determining whether a person who should be joined is actually indispensable – that is, essential to dismiss the action when that person cannot be joined.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Too Discretionary.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza:
PUBBLICO DOMINIO
Dimensione
419.73 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
419.73 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
