Some firms are initiating pro-stakeholder activities and policies that transcend conventional corporate social responsibility (CSR) conceptions and seem inconsistent with their business interests or economic responsibilities. These initiatives, which are neither legally nor morally obligatory, are responding to calls for a more active role of business in society and for a broader interpretation of CSR. In fact, they benefit stakeholders in a superior and innovative way and are difficult to reconcile with commonly used rationales in the extant CSR literature, such as win-win opportunities, creating shared value, or corporate philanthropy. For better insight, we develop a qualified account of the concept of supererogation from ethical theory. This account, which examines voluntary responses to moral obligations from which a business is normally excused, is applied to identify the unique features of the initiatives that are not readily understood within conventional reasoning generally focused on a business case.

A qualified account of supererogation: toward a better conceptualization of Corporate Social Responsibility

Antonio Tencati
;
Nicola Misani;Sandro Castaldo
2020

Abstract

Some firms are initiating pro-stakeholder activities and policies that transcend conventional corporate social responsibility (CSR) conceptions and seem inconsistent with their business interests or economic responsibilities. These initiatives, which are neither legally nor morally obligatory, are responding to calls for a more active role of business in society and for a broader interpretation of CSR. In fact, they benefit stakeholders in a superior and innovative way and are difficult to reconcile with commonly used rationales in the extant CSR literature, such as win-win opportunities, creating shared value, or corporate philanthropy. For better insight, we develop a qualified account of the concept of supererogation from ethical theory. This account, which examines voluntary responses to moral obligations from which a business is normally excused, is applied to identify the unique features of the initiatives that are not readily understood within conventional reasoning generally focused on a business case.
2020
2020
Tencati, Antonio; Misani, Nicola; Castaldo, Sandro
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Supererogation_accepted.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Versione pre-print dell'articolo accettato
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (Pre-print document)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 263.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
263.83 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Business Ethics Quarterly Decision on BEQTH17063R5 (Scherer).pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Lettera di accettazione da parte dell'Associate Editor della rivista
Tipologia: Allegato per valutazione Bocconi (Attachment for Bocconi evaluation)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 79.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
79.36 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Business Ethics Quarterly Decision on BEQTH17063R5 (website).pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Conferma accettazione finale in Author Dashboard
Tipologia: Allegato per valutazione Bocconi (Attachment for Bocconi evaluation)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 383.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
383.3 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/4022327
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact