A population of agents is stratiÖed in a two-layer status hierarchy, and they form couples to participate in contests to win a prize (of recognition). Partners in a couple can have equal or di§erent status, they compete together against all the other couples, and possibly also between them to appropriate the prize. Status di§erences generate inequalities due to an external bias in evaluation of the contestants ñ the Matthew e§ect ñ and to a bias internal to the couple due to the asymmetry of power when dividing the prize ñ the power e§ect. We relate agentsíequilibrium investments to win the contest and their e§orts to appropriate the prize to the number of contestants and to the distribution of status among them, further revealing the endogenous formation of homophilous and heterophilous associations. Our analysis reveals that the di§erences in status are only reáected in the agentsístrategic behavior and not in the outcome of the contest (among the couples) and in the allocation of the prize (within the couple). Moreover, the status homophily principle holds true only in small populations where status is concentrated among few agents.

Endogenous association in contests with inequality effects of status

Panico, Claudio;Castellucci, Fabrizio
2017

Abstract

A population of agents is stratiÖed in a two-layer status hierarchy, and they form couples to participate in contests to win a prize (of recognition). Partners in a couple can have equal or di§erent status, they compete together against all the other couples, and possibly also between them to appropriate the prize. Status di§erences generate inequalities due to an external bias in evaluation of the contestants ñ the Matthew e§ect ñ and to a bias internal to the couple due to the asymmetry of power when dividing the prize ñ the power e§ect. We relate agentsíequilibrium investments to win the contest and their e§orts to appropriate the prize to the number of contestants and to the distribution of status among them, further revealing the endogenous formation of homophilous and heterophilous associations. Our analysis reveals that the di§erences in status are only reáected in the agentsístrategic behavior and not in the outcome of the contest (among the couples) and in the allocation of the prize (within the couple). Moreover, the status homophily principle holds true only in small populations where status is concentrated among few agents.
2017
2017
Panico, Claudio; Castellucci, Fabrizio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AoM-2017-Contests.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (Pre-print document)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 585.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
585.68 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3998651
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact