This note focuses on the elements of novelty that characterise the 2016 stress test, based on the methodological notes released by the European Banking Authority, and discusses in closer detail the following key aspects: the request for specific forecasts concerning ‘conduct risk’; the greater attention towards risks originated by foreign exchange exposures; the lack of a ‘pass/fail’ threshold that partitions tested banks into ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ ones; and the change in the sample size of banks required to take the test.
The 2016 EU-wide bank stress test: an analysis of the main methodological novelties
RESTI, ANDREA CESARE
2016
Abstract
This note focuses on the elements of novelty that characterise the 2016 stress test, based on the methodological notes released by the European Banking Authority, and discusses in closer detail the following key aspects: the request for specific forecasts concerning ‘conduct risk’; the greater attention towards risks originated by foreign exchange exposures; the lack of a ‘pass/fail’ threshold that partitions tested banks into ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ ones; and the change in the sample size of banks required to take the test.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
IJBAAF finale.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
254.3 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
254.3 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.