In this paper we investigate the validity of the Pecking Order Theory on all Italian publicly traded firms from 1987 to 2012. According to this theory, firms have to rely first on internal cash flows to finance new investments. Whenever external financing is necessary, firms need to issue first debt whereas equity is the least preferred option, due to the asymmetric information problems it generates. Our results indicate that Italian firms, in contrast to the pecking order theory, often rely on equity to finance their deficit. In particular, this is true for firms at the beginning of 2000s' and for small firms.

The pecking order theory: evidence from the Italian market

PUOPOLO, GIOVANNI WALTER;TETI, EMANUELE
2014

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the validity of the Pecking Order Theory on all Italian publicly traded firms from 1987 to 2012. According to this theory, firms have to rely first on internal cash flows to finance new investments. Whenever external financing is necessary, firms need to issue first debt whereas equity is the least preferred option, due to the asymmetric information problems it generates. Our results indicate that Italian firms, in contrast to the pecking order theory, often rely on equity to finance their deficit. In particular, this is true for firms at the beginning of 2000s' and for small firms.
2014
Puopolo, GIOVANNI WALTER; R., Ponzi; Teti, Emanuele
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3976125
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact