Social enterprises are at risk of undermining the authenticity of their social purpose in the attempt to manage and balance multiple stakeholders’ expectations. This study explores dynamics of dual mission management in relation to a group of UK Social Enterprises via an inductive qualitative multi-cases method. Results suggest that approaches to dual mission management vary along a continuum ranging from the dimension of high compartmentalization to the dimension of high integration. It emerged that blended strategic planning, tailored production processes and blended governance and management structures are critical key drivers of integration approaches to dual mission management.

Dual-mission management in social entrepreneurship: Qualitative evidence from social firms in UK

VURRO, CLODIA;PERRINI, FRANCESCO
2014

Abstract

Social enterprises are at risk of undermining the authenticity of their social purpose in the attempt to manage and balance multiple stakeholders’ expectations. This study explores dynamics of dual mission management in relation to a group of UK Social Enterprises via an inductive qualitative multi-cases method. Results suggest that approaches to dual mission management vary along a continuum ranging from the dimension of high compartmentalization to the dimension of high integration. It emerged that blended strategic planning, tailored production processes and blended governance and management structures are critical key drivers of integration approaches to dual mission management.
2014
L. A., Costanzo; Vurro, Clodia; D., Foster; F., Servato; Perrini, Francesco
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3901918
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 60
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 49
social impact