Incumbent firms, especially in high-tech industries, often contract and collaborate with small research units on single projects. A delicate resulting contracting decision thus is how to allocate control. This paper considers the incumbent's problem to design a research contract that specifies: the allocation of control; the unit's research input, and its monetary compensation. Contracting is complicated by the unit's private information about its technological skills; research outputs also are not verifiable. Control affects the distribution of the private benefits from research and can be shared. From a complete contracts perspective, an allocation of control that is contingent on the unit's reported information provides the incumbent an additional instrument for designing the incentives. Control can generate countervailing incentives and mitigate the limitations of contracts in research environments, to the point of extracting the full surplus. The analysis further clarifies when control is centralized by the incumbent, when it is shared between the parties, and when it is delegated to the unit.

Control and contract design in research collaborations: a complete contracts perspective

Panico, Claudio
2012

Abstract

Incumbent firms, especially in high-tech industries, often contract and collaborate with small research units on single projects. A delicate resulting contracting decision thus is how to allocate control. This paper considers the incumbent's problem to design a research contract that specifies: the allocation of control; the unit's research input, and its monetary compensation. Contracting is complicated by the unit's private information about its technological skills; research outputs also are not verifiable. Control affects the distribution of the private benefits from research and can be shared. From a complete contracts perspective, an allocation of control that is contingent on the unit's reported information provides the incumbent an additional instrument for designing the incentives. Control can generate countervailing incentives and mitigate the limitations of contracts in research environments, to the point of extracting the full surplus. The analysis further clarifies when control is centralized by the incumbent, when it is shared between the parties, and when it is delegated to the unit.
2012
2012
Panico, Claudio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Letter of acceptance IJIO.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Allegato per valutazione Bocconi (Attachment for Bocconi evaluation)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 11.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
11.1 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
4.IJIO.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: article
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (Post-print document)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 886.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
886.76 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
4.Panico-IJIO-2012.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: article
Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 802.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
802.34 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3740050
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact