This historical case study of Olivetti, the Italian office products firm, argues that technological competence becomes socially embedded in a firm over time as it is legitimized, backed by powerful agents, and supported by resource allocation. Paradoxically, these three building blocks of a competence—legitimacy, power, and resources—both promote inertia and enable change. Inertia can be overcome when firms employ three levers of transition: organizationally separating an emerging technology to protect it, co-opting legitimacy by using the new technology to serve the incumbent technology, and diverting resources for the emerging technology’s development. Over time, the emerging technology achieves enough legitimacy, power, and resources in the firm to overtake, and ultimately displace, the incumbent competence. We develop an integrative model of technology transition that contributes to literature on resources, dynamic capabilities, competence-destroying change, and ambidexterity.

Overcoming the inertia of organizational competence: Olivetti’s transition from mechanical to electronic technology

DANNEELS, ERWIN
;
Verona, Gianmario;Provera, Bernardino
2018

Abstract

This historical case study of Olivetti, the Italian office products firm, argues that technological competence becomes socially embedded in a firm over time as it is legitimized, backed by powerful agents, and supported by resource allocation. Paradoxically, these three building blocks of a competence—legitimacy, power, and resources—both promote inertia and enable change. Inertia can be overcome when firms employ three levers of transition: organizationally separating an emerging technology to protect it, co-opting legitimacy by using the new technology to serve the incumbent technology, and diverting resources for the emerging technology’s development. Over time, the emerging technology achieves enough legitimacy, power, and resources in the firm to overtake, and ultimately displace, the incumbent competence. We develop an integrative model of technology transition that contributes to literature on resources, dynamic capabilities, competence-destroying change, and ambidexterity.
2018
2017
Danneels, Erwin; Verona, Gianmario; Provera, Bernardino
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
GVerona_ICC_2017.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Pdf editoriale (Publisher's layout)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 387.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
387.79 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Letter_GV_ICC_2017.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Allegato per valutazione Bocconi (Attachment for Bocconi evaluation)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 68.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
68.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/4002250
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact