Background. Primary care teams (hereafter referred to as primary care units, PCUs) composed of general practitioners (GPs), nurses and specialist doctors have recently been established in the Italian context, with the main aim of improving integrated care for chronic diseases. Purposes. To assess whether the increased professional diversity of PCUs has resulted in an improvement in the integrated care of type II diabetes and to identify a potential mechanism mediating this effect. Methodology/Approach. We analyzed 213 PCUs, comparing their performance in integrated type II diabetes care at two time points. Using social categorization theory and a fixed effects regression analysis, we tested a mediation model in which the frequency of communication among GPs in the PCUs, i.e., within-subgroup communication, mediates the relationship between PCU professional diversity and team performance in diabetes care. Findings. We show that when the professional diversity of the PCUs increases, integrated care of type II diabetes improves and better meets the standards of optimal care. Within-GP subgroup communication works as a mediating mechanism that translates the PCU professional diversity into better team performance. The mediation effect, however, is curvilinear. Beyond certain levels, within-subgroup communication can hamper PCUs’ capacity to work collaboratively in integrated type II diabetes care. Practice Implications. The paper suggests that when creating interprofessional primary care teams, managers might be able to steer teams towards a better performance by encouraging communication among peers of the same profession.

When peers count: the effects on integrated type II diabetes care of communication within general practitioner-only subgroups in interprofessional primary care teams

COMPAGNI, AMELIA;ARMENI, PATRIZIO;TASSELLI, STEFANO
2017

Abstract

Background. Primary care teams (hereafter referred to as primary care units, PCUs) composed of general practitioners (GPs), nurses and specialist doctors have recently been established in the Italian context, with the main aim of improving integrated care for chronic diseases. Purposes. To assess whether the increased professional diversity of PCUs has resulted in an improvement in the integrated care of type II diabetes and to identify a potential mechanism mediating this effect. Methodology/Approach. We analyzed 213 PCUs, comparing their performance in integrated type II diabetes care at two time points. Using social categorization theory and a fixed effects regression analysis, we tested a mediation model in which the frequency of communication among GPs in the PCUs, i.e., within-subgroup communication, mediates the relationship between PCU professional diversity and team performance in diabetes care. Findings. We show that when the professional diversity of the PCUs increases, integrated care of type II diabetes improves and better meets the standards of optimal care. Within-GP subgroup communication works as a mediating mechanism that translates the PCU professional diversity into better team performance. The mediation effect, however, is curvilinear. Beyond certain levels, within-subgroup communication can hamper PCUs’ capacity to work collaboratively in integrated type II diabetes care. Practice Implications. The paper suggests that when creating interprofessional primary care teams, managers might be able to steer teams towards a better performance by encouraging communication among peers of the same profession.
2017
2017
Compagni, Amelia; Armeni, Patrizio; Tasselli, Stefano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
00004010-900000000-99750.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (Post-print document)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 521.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
521.79 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3995016
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact