This article re-assesses the evidence and practical relevance of asset returns’ long-horizon predictability, investigating whether practitioners can profitably exploit predictability patterns by using relatively simple, dynamic asset allocation strategies. The analysis shows forward-looking models that rely on steady-state equations for equities and initial yields to maturity for bonds are far better predictors of markets’ long-run direction than is the industry’s conventional approach, which involves extrapolating from historical averages. Using a long-term U.S. sample from 1926 to 2010, the authors find that predictability translates into significantly better risk-adjusted performance from dynamic asset allocation strategies that rely on forward-looking inputs.

The power of dynamic asset allocation

NAVONE, MARCO;
2014

Abstract

This article re-assesses the evidence and practical relevance of asset returns’ long-horizon predictability, investigating whether practitioners can profitably exploit predictability patterns by using relatively simple, dynamic asset allocation strategies. The analysis shows forward-looking models that rely on steady-state equations for equities and initial yields to maturity for bonds are far better predictors of markets’ long-run direction than is the industry’s conventional approach, which involves extrapolating from historical averages. Using a long-term U.S. sample from 1926 to 2010, the authors find that predictability translates into significantly better risk-adjusted performance from dynamic asset allocation strategies that rely on forward-looking inputs.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3974940
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact