International anti‐money laundering programs: empirical assessment and issues in criminal regulation

The purpose of this paper is to present an empirical assessment and outline issues in criminal regulation relating to international anti-money laundering (AML) programs. Design/methodology/approach – In the first part, this paper outlines the serious threats posed by transnational laundering operations in the context of economic globalization, and calls for highly co-ordinated international responses to such a crime. The second part of the paper centres on elements of international criminal regulation of ML. Findings – The focus is on the phenomenological aspect of ML and highlights that to a large extent it is an economic issue. Economic analysis calls for an accurate legal response, with typical trade-offs: it should deter criminals from laundering by increasing the costs for such illicit operations, calling for enhanced regulatory and enforcement activities; however, stronger enforcement yields increased costs and reduces privacy. These features have lately inspired the recent paradigm shift from a rule-based regulatory framework to a risk-based approach which still represents an extremely delicate regulatory. Both at the international level and within the single domestic legal system, AML law is typically characterised by a multidisciplinary approach combining the repressive profile with preventive mechanisms: an empirical evaluation of the International Monetary Fund-World Bank AML program is presented, where these two aspects are assessed. The non-criminal measures recently implemented under the auspices of the main inter-governmental public organisations with competence in these fields seem to be consistent with the insights of economic analysis. However, some key criminal issues need to be better addressed. Originality/value – The paper offers insights into international AML programs, focusing on criminal regulation.