The institutions of the European Union have intensified their political efforts to combat youth employment since the beginning of the millennium. Youth-specific policy initiatives have been launched since the financial and economic crisis of 2008, and the overall subsequent rise of unemployment rates amongst young people. In this article, we analyse and assess these developments on the basis of an analysis of European policy documents and interviews. Our conclusions are twofold. One the one hand, we argue that the Europe 2020 Strategy and its flagship initiatives devoted to youth do not constitute a new policy field or approach, but are rather the outcome of an incrementalist logic of policy development – not fully supported by neither business associations nor trade unions. On the other hand, an European youth unemployment strategy is perceivably not oriented towards full ‘flexicurity’, because it privileges activation against security, and pushes policy developments towards a minimalist regime of precarious protection. Both developments are explained by the ideational and strategic structures of the European policy arena, i.e., by established discourses and bargains within the EU.

Promoting social Europe? The development of European youth unemployment policies (1997 – 2010)

Graziano, Paolo Roberto
2013

Abstract

The institutions of the European Union have intensified their political efforts to combat youth employment since the beginning of the millennium. Youth-specific policy initiatives have been launched since the financial and economic crisis of 2008, and the overall subsequent rise of unemployment rates amongst young people. In this article, we analyse and assess these developments on the basis of an analysis of European policy documents and interviews. Our conclusions are twofold. One the one hand, we argue that the Europe 2020 Strategy and its flagship initiatives devoted to youth do not constitute a new policy field or approach, but are rather the outcome of an incrementalist logic of policy development – not fully supported by neither business associations nor trade unions. On the other hand, an European youth unemployment strategy is perceivably not oriented towards full ‘flexicurity’, because it privileges activation against security, and pushes policy developments towards a minimalist regime of precarious protection. Both developments are explained by the ideational and strategic structures of the European policy arena, i.e., by established discourses and bargains within the EU.
2013
2013
Lahusen, Christian; Schulz, Natalia; Graziano, Paolo Roberto
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ijsw_12011[1].pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (Pre-print document)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 169.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
169.85 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3780896
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 44
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact