The comment provides, using household level data, some measures of the magnitude of the increase in income risk and of how much of it has actually resulted in increased consumption risk. The main finding is that household idiosyncratic risk has increased but consumption risk has increased much less. Since the paper suggests that the use of unsecured credit cannot be responsible for stable consumption risk, despite increasing income risk, I explore possible reasons that prevented the rise in consumption risk.

Comment on: “Unsecured credit markets are not insurance markets” by Kartik Athreya, Xuan S. Tam and Eric R. Young

PERRI, FABRIZIO
2009

Abstract

The comment provides, using household level data, some measures of the magnitude of the increase in income risk and of how much of it has actually resulted in increased consumption risk. The main finding is that household idiosyncratic risk has increased but consumption risk has increased much less. Since the paper suggests that the use of unsecured credit cannot be responsible for stable consumption risk, despite increasing income risk, I explore possible reasons that prevented the rise in consumption risk.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3778501
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact