Relying on social exchange theory and technology acceptance literature, our research argues that users' acceptance of a newly introduced technology is related to the beliefs that individuals have about their social relationships with the supervisor, the team members, and the organization as a whole. Besides confirming previous findings in the acceptance domain, our results demonstrate that perceived usefulness and ease of use about technology are influenced by team-member exchange, leader-member exchange, and organizational support, while affective commitment toward the organization shows a positive influence only on perceived usefulness. Theoretical and practical implications are offered. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Intra-organizational relationships and technology acceptance

MAGNI, MASSIMO;PENNAROLA, FERDINANDO
2008

Abstract

Relying on social exchange theory and technology acceptance literature, our research argues that users' acceptance of a newly introduced technology is related to the beliefs that individuals have about their social relationships with the supervisor, the team members, and the organization as a whole. Besides confirming previous findings in the acceptance domain, our results demonstrate that perceived usefulness and ease of use about technology are influenced by team-member exchange, leader-member exchange, and organizational support, while affective commitment toward the organization shows a positive influence only on perceived usefulness. Theoretical and practical implications are offered. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3761675
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact