Asset commitment , constitutional governance and the nature of the firm

Integrating organization theory, organizational economics and organizational law considerations, it is argued that the ‘nature of the firm’ can be more completely understood if it is considered a complete society-establishing contract, including constitutional pacts on procedures for the selection of actions; rather than a nexus of incomplete transactional contracts complemented by authority, power or relational norms. The explanation is more general since firm-establishing contracts are a sub-set of those society-establishing contracts, which are capable of regulating any venture in condition of high uncertainty and potential conflict; and because the constitutional regime adopted (authority-based, democratic or other) becomes a specification of particular types of firms rather than part of the explanation of the firm. Evidence from published studies, as well as from newly gathered data on firm-founding contracts and other partnership establishing contracts (500 record database on large multi-party projects), document that actual contracts under uncertainty do fit the hypothesized pattern