Legal argumentation has become one of the prominent research domains of legal philosophy in the last fifty years and its study has deeply influenced this discipline. One of the reasons of this is that the criteria of rationality and correctness which apply to legal interpretation and adjudication mainly consist in argumentative rules governing the legal practice. But how these rules can be properly singled out and analyzed remains highly controversial. With contributions from philosophers, logicians and lawyers, this book tries to provide a new framework, "Legal Inferentialism", for the analysis and critical assessment of such legal and philosophical issues.

The rules of inference: inferentialism in law and philosophy

CANALE, DAMIANO;TUZET, GIOVANNI
2009

Abstract

Legal argumentation has become one of the prominent research domains of legal philosophy in the last fifty years and its study has deeply influenced this discipline. One of the reasons of this is that the criteria of rationality and correctness which apply to legal interpretation and adjudication mainly consist in argumentative rules governing the legal practice. But how these rules can be properly singled out and analyzed remains highly controversial. With contributions from philosophers, logicians and lawyers, this book tries to provide a new framework, "Legal Inferentialism", for the analysis and critical assessment of such legal and philosophical issues.
2009
Egea
9788823842465
Canale, Damiano; Tuzet, Giovanni
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11565/3188991
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact